Eviction
Threats
Many people
move out due to eviction threats and "advisories" or "warnings"
that OMI and Ellis evictions are forthcoming. In fact, there may be
more people displaced this way than due to actual OMI or Ellis evictions.
These threats usually take the form of a letter or phone call telling
the tenants that "my mother will probably be moving into your unit
next May..." or "I wanted to let you know I will be doing
an Ellis eviction this Summer." If in writing, the letter is often
made to look like an eviction notice but will specifically state "this
is not an eviction notice." Far too many tenants move out based
on these letters or calls and the landlords simply re-rent the units.
Landlords
seek to get tenants out via these threats because doing an actual OMI
or Ellis eviction means that re-rental restrictions apply to the unit
and tenants can sue for wrongful eviction if the landlord does not move
in or does not take the building off the rental market. If landlords
can get tenants to move out based on a threat or warning or advisory,
they will claim the tenant moved out "voluntarily" and thus
they are not bound by the re-rental restrictions and will just re-rent
the unit at a far higher price.
In 2002,
San Francisco passed an ordinance seeking to reign in these threats.
The Daly Eviction Threats Legislation, though, has been partially thrown
out in court. Nonetheless, some protections remain for tenants
If You
Get An Eviction Threat/Warning/Advisory: Do not move outyou
do not have an eviction notice. Landlords will claim that they are merely
being "nice" trying to give a tenant extra time. Usually they
are not that nice. If a landlord wants to give someone extra time, there
is no reason they can not give a tenant a one year, or six month, actual
eviction notice at the appropriate time. Our experience is that if a
landlord really wants to evict you for OMI or Ellis they will give you
an eviction noticenot one of these threats or advisories.
Besides not
moving, you should also file a "Petition For Wrongful Eviction"
at the SF Rent Board to document that you received such a threat. This
will help you later if you do end up moving because of the sections
in the Eviction Threats legislation which remain in place. These sections
contain important protections, but rest on whether or not the threat
was adequately documented. Filing a Wrongful Eviction Petition will
provide such documentation.
The provisions
of the Daly Eviction Threats law which remain in place are:
Strengthen
Tenant Ability To Sue For Wrongful Eviction Based on Threat
It is presumed that any tenant who vacates a unit within 120 days after
a threat left pursuant to that threat. If the landlord fails to use
the apartment for the purpose stated in the threat, it is presumed that
the threat was in bad faith.
Kick In
Re-Rental Provisions of Just Cause After Threat Any unit
which a tenant vacates pursuant to a threat will be subject to the restrictions
within the just cause (e.g., OMI and Ellis right to re-rent and any
re-rental limitations; Capital Improvements right to re-rent), regardless
of any agreement made between the tenant and landlord.
Sales
of Vacant Units Landlords must disclose to sellers the legal
grounds for termination of the tenancies of any units which are to be
delivered vacant at the close of escrow.
OMI Evictions
Landlords must now file a proof of service of the OMI notice
at the Rent Board along with a copy of the notice and the disclosure
requirements of 37.9B (previously the proof of service was not required).
Second, OMI evictions will be recorded on the deed of the property,
so that new landlords will be bound by the re-rental restrictions.
The
SF Tenants Union is supported only by your memberships and donations.
If you find information on this web site useful, or if you want to support
our work, please join or donate. Members get even more information via
our Tenants Rights Handbook plus access to phone counseling
Join
or Donate By Credit or Debit Card